Human Development along with the Advancement of Technology

Is your kid playing too much video games? Do you know someone who’s playing 24/7? Look around and count how many people are using their phones while walking.

Technology, dominates most of what we learn about the world through the media. Societies having the most of technology are also, again and again, claimed to be the most complex. It’s not their progress that lifts them into the pinnacle of superiority, power, and popularity. This point doesn’t necessarily indicate that technological progress is a mark of a civilization.

What we will need to understand is that technology and civilization aren’t terms. It’s from people who all types of structures could be created the question of science and technology’s behaviour makeup. Thus, bridges, roads, buildings amongst others, that we can see in a society’s sort could tell, in a way, the people’s pattern. Pattern could tell a lot about the degree to which the environment was used for science activities and technology. Above all pattern could tell a lot about comprehension and the senses of the people about men and women.

After advancing technology partnered with the green surroundings for distance, this environment that homes trees, grass, flowers, all sorts of fish and animals needs to shrink in size. Yet the increase of population, the relentless yearning for quality life, the need to control life without depending on the environment’s condition prompt technology’s use. Technology need not pose danger. To be able to offset the destruction of the latter imagine society Y blends the use of technology with the surroundings, then this sort of positioning prompts the point that society Y is a lover of the principle of equilibrium. One can conclude that society Y has, and favours stability over madnessthe sense of social and moral responsibility. Any technology that is state-of-the-art points to the complexity of the human mind, and it signals that the environment has been tamed.

If humans don’t want to stay at the mercy of the environment – which is an method of life – but according to their pace, then using technologies is a matter of course. It would appear that this is more of a place than a genuine one or that the principle of balance that society Y has selected could be for a while. For when itself is gratified by the power of the mind after a momentous achievement retreat, in engineering, or, at best, a slow-down is unusual. This sort of thought process points from the enigma of the mind not its area that is greatest. And in trying to interrogate a technology’s mode in line with the mind’s directions, ethics’ function is vital.

Is it right to use this sort of technology?

And is it right to use this sort of product? Both concerns hint that the product or products in question are not or dangerous friendly or not, or they don’t only lead to injury to humans but to the environment. It implies that the level the mind has attained is not able to grasp reason or the nature of quality life. For the sake of an inquiring mind, a peaceful coexistence with the natural environment could have been deserted in this regard. The mind could, as it were, become corrupted with ideas or beliefs that are untenable in numerous ways.

Environmentalists the advocacy that’s accomplished by environmentalists relate to its consequences on humans and the question of ecological degradation. They insist that there’s not any reason for producing products which harm both humans and the environment.

This contention sounds convincing.

Often, most humans have a tendency to believe that a lifestyle that is complex is better than a one. The former is supported by high technology’s burden, the latter is not. The prior facilitates the burden of depending on the dictates of the surroundings, the latter doesn’t. The latter tends to seek out a relationship the former doesn’t. Whether comfort should come from the environment or an advanced technology is not. Then technology must ease the pressures, if the surroundings is shrinking because of population growth and other unavoidable causes. It’s the proliferation of, say, war technology amongst others, that need to stop and are in need of criticism.